A lack of vibrancy in Salt Lake County’s second downtown

Ad
Construction is winding down on the Sandy Tower East building as seen from Sego Lily Drive. Photo by Isaac Riddle.
Construction is underway on both the Hale Centre Theater (left) and the new headquarters of the Mountain American Credit Union (right) as seen from Monroe Street. Photo by Isaac Riddle.

Salt Lake City is Utah’s urban center with the largest city population, downtown population and number of city workers.  But 15 miles to the south of the capital city, the growing downtown in the suburban city of Sandy has become Salt Lake County’s second largest urban center, trailing only downtown Salt Lake in commercial space and growth in multifamily development.

Yet, while both city’s downtowns have gaps in vibrancy, those gaps are more prominent in downtown Sandy serving as a reminder that density doesn’t guarantee vibrancy.

To determine vibrancy, Building Salt Lake using the vibrancy scale created by University of Utah professor, Reid Ewing.  Ewing’s scale measures vibrancy based on five characteristics.

  • Imageability: is the visual impact based on the personal experience of the pedestrian, including trees, landscape, landmarks and signage.
  • Enclosure: buildings, trees and walls create a room-like ambiance along a street.
  • Human Scale:  is the spatial relationship between structures and human proportions.
  • Transparency: is the visibility or perception of human activity between public and private space.
  • Complexity: includes structural and aesthetic details that create rhythm along a corridor.

The research team at the Wasatch Front Regional Council used Reid’s vibrancy scale to measure the vibrancy key nodes and corridors in Salt County.  Based on WFRC’s score, most of downtown Salt Lake scores well above the regional average vibrancy score of 15.9.  Most of downtown Salt Lake’s blocks were 10 to 20 points above the average while every single block measured in downtown Sandy was at below the 15.9 average.

In comparison, Walk Score gives downtown Sanday a walk score of 59, while downtown Salt Lake have a walk score of 87.

Despite these differences in vibrancy, both downtowns are attracting a lot of development.  While the majority of development in and around downtown Salt Lake is focused on multifamily projects, in downtown Sandy commercial development is leading the recent growth.

According to 2017 MarketView report by CBRE, downtown Sandy accounts for almost half of the commercial space under construction countywide with 657,600 square feet of commercial space underway in Sandy.  The bulk of commercial space underway in downtown Sandy comes from two projects, Sandy Tower East and the new headquarters for Mountain America Credit Union.  Downtown Sandy is second only to downtown Salt Lake in leasable commercial office space.

The Sandy Tower East, at the Beetdigger Boulevard and Sego Lily Drive, is nearly complete and is five stories with over 300,000 square feet of commercial space.

The other office tower underway, the 11-story future headquarters of the Mountain America Credit on the 9900 block of Monroe Street is actively under construction and will add 327,000 square feet of commercial space to downtown Sandy.

The Mountian America building will share a 1,800-stall parking lot with the under-construction, Hale Centre Theater directly south of the office building.  The 130,000-square-foot Hale Centre Theatre is framed out and will include to theaters.  Neither the Hale Center Theater or Mountain America Building will have good street engagement and the shared surface parking lot will separate the office tower from the sidewalk instead of occupying the rear of the building separating it from the nearby interstate.

Construction is underway on the next phase of the East Village as seen from Beetdigger Boulevard. Photo by Isaac Riddle.

In addition to commercial development, downtown Sandy has added hundreds of new units with hundreds more underway.   Construction recently finished on the Park at City Center, a 330-unit apartment building directly east of the Hale Centre Theater.  The five-story apartment building is single use despite the hundreds of new residents the project brings and the hundreds of workers from adjacent commercial buildings that must drive to reach any retail.  Unlike some of the other adjacent buildings, the Park at City Center goes up to the sidewalk but the block-long building has no active ground floor uses.

Another residential project under construction in the downtown area is the next phase of the East Village development, framing has started on that project that will add an additional 146 units to an area that has welcomed several hundred new residential units in the past three years.  As with the other nearby residential projects, the East Village development is adjacent to a TRAX light rail station but doesn’t engage with the station, with surface parking separating the station from the development and the developments ground floors fronting away from more active thoroughfares.

While city leaders in Sandy have been successful in attracting commercial office space and multifamily residential, these uses happen in separate, distinct buildings with no retail or eateries in walking distance of the district’s hundreds of employees and new residents.

Vibrancy is key to a healthy downtown.  As Salt Lake County’s second largest urban center, how downtown Sandy develops benefits the region as a walkable, vibrant downtown can serve as an example of smart growth that complements downtown Salt Lake.  Instead, the majority of new development in downtown Sandy lacks most of the characteristics of vibrancy defined by Ewing.  While there is arguably some imageability, the neighborhood lacks real enclosure, complexity, human scale and transparency as each separate building provides a single use and occupies a large footprint without any real active uses at the street level.

The recently completed, Park at City Center (right) and an adjacent office building bring density without vibrancy or street engagement. Photo by Isaac Riddle.
Residential and commercial office space are abundant in downtown Sandy but uses are isolated in single-use buildings as seen with the Sandy Tower East and the Hills at Sandy Station on Sego Lily Drive. Photo by Isaac Riddle.
About Isaac Riddle 630 Articles

Isaac Riddle grew up just outside of Salt Lake City, Utah. He has a BA in English literature from the University of Utah and a Masters of Journalism from Temple University. Isaac has written for
Next City, The Philadelphia Public School Notebook and Salt Lake City Weekly. Before embarking on a career in journalism, Isaac taught High School English in the Kensington neighborhood of Philadelphia. Isaac is the founder of Building Salt Lake and can be reached at isaac@buildingsaltlake.com.

  • kelly salmans

    More ugly buildings!

  • Soren Simonsen

    Sandy downtown is struggling for vibrancy. West Valley City downtown is the same. Sugar House is struggling with recent developments on the ShopKo block. The question here is…who is responsible for the urban design realm? Is it the city officials who formulate public policy? Is it city planners and planning commissions who coordinate details through plan review? Is it the developer to conceives of the project? Is it the architects and landscape architects who put form and function to the design? Is it the schools of architecture and landscape architecture that train designers to create buildings and sites, but without understanding or concern for the urban context? Is it all of these? We certainly need much better urban design literacy and skill across all of the disciplines that are stewards of our built environment.

  • katbailey13

    I would say all of the above. The bottom line is Money. Developers always want to Squeeze more units without open space for gathering and mingling. Planning commissions are a bunch of volunteers who don’t really know squat about planning, design, etc., and rules and regs. are not Flexible enough–common sense is thrown out the window. Sad thing–probably won’t change.

  • Matt Miller

    ‘Second Downtown’ is more aspirational than factual.

  • Building Salt Lake

    That distinction is based on the number of multifamily residential units and commercial office space. Downtown Sandy is second only to downtown Salt Lake in both and has more than twice the amount of commercial office space than the third place submarket.

  • Bailey

    The apartment construction image is not the next phase of the Hills at Sandy Station, it’s the final building for Phase 1 of the East Village apartments. Phase 2 is bringing ground-floor retail to that street.

  • Matt Miller

    Sandy has made huge strides in adding multi-family apartment units along TRAX, and huge amounts of office space along I-15. What they haven’t done is integrate them. Doing so won’t be simple. In addition to I-15, there is State Street, which is 7-9 lanes wide, with only 3 ways across. The East Jordan Canal, the Jordan and Salt Lake Canal, and the TRAX corridor itself all supply further barriers to pedestrian circulation.

  • Building Salt Lake

    You’re right on East Village, the mistake has been corrected.

  • Matt Miller

    The scales of planning (both geographic and temporal) don’t match site-scale design particularly well. Good design can be regulated, to a certain extent, but that regulation has to be market-conscious, so that it makes financial sense for developers to build in that jurisdiction. Design review by planners/planning comissioners works in cities where almost all new development is infill, but is too resource intensive for newly incorporated cities managing the subdivision process. Right now, form-based codes are generating some of the best-looking new development I’m seeing.

  • Matt Miller

    Define ugly.

  • Matt Miller

    Any developer for who money isn’t the bottom line isn’t a developer for long. Per square foot of construction, more units generate more rents. Two studios generate $600 a month, vs. $900 for a 2-bedroom, for the same floor-space. Three and four bedroom apartments are almost non-existent for this reason.

  • Matt Miller

    Historically, the ‘mingling’ spaces of urban places have been semi-public spaces: Hallways, alleyways, small streets, and the plazas where two streets intersect at odd angles. Larger spaces (plazas, squares, parks) tend to be public, and publicly owned.